I've been a working editor at newspapers for more than forty years, working every day to make sure that the copy passing through my hands was as accurate as I could establish, and also in, you know, English.
Throughout those forty years I've listened to a drumbeat of complaints about media bias, most of it coming from people who dislike factual reporting that doesn't suit their preferences.
(Media bias, though, is real. You want to know where it exists? Most journalism reflects the viewpoint of middle-class white people, because that's who most journalists have been, and that's who most of the subscribers have been.)
But I've listened to four decades of this codswallop, and I'm sixty-nine years old and tired of it.
Just today, in a Facebook exchange with people Back Home in Kentucky, some person I don't (fortunately) know commented, "Documented evidence? Since when does a reporter care about documented evidence? Only when it suits their ideology."
I responded, "If what you know about journalism is no more than this ignorant remark, I can’t see that there’s any reason to pay any attention to you ever again."
I'm tried of coddling these people. Try to reason with them and offer actual evidence, and they simply resort to calling you a "libtard" or some other schoolyard insult. You never, ever get a response that addresses the merits.
So, no more Mr. Nice Guy.
Try doing something useful with your life and read Michael Malice’s _The New Right_; by doing so, you might come to understand that what the corporate press, whom you champion, has is an agenda, not a bias.
ReplyDeleteThe “white people” part was a nice touch, too.
The corporate press indeed has an agenda. It is capitalist, and it is looking to make money. Happy to be able to explain this to you.
DeleteMark Twain wrote: "There's no amount of facts that will ever convince an idiot." (Or is it "fool?")
ReplyDeleteYou are really amazing. I will follow you
ReplyDelete